As for Robert Latimer, he regards modern medicine as "mutilation". He turned down a feeding tube for Tracy, hip surgery, a permanent place in a group home and a place in a respite home. As for Tracy, her caretaker at the group home said that she is a smiling happy girl and that there was no indication that she was in agony or constant pain. Tracy's mom wrote a diary of her life and yet made virtually no mention of her being in pain. Clearly you are completely ignorant on this issue and I would advise you not to rant about things you know nothing about.
I would imagine that the ICL would be quite irate with you as they tend to be extremely fearful of unofficial representatives of their organization.
Comradely, Michael Gregory, Sympathizer for the Bolshevik Tendency
As for the statement by the Sparts that "even bourgeois academia acknowledges" that the disabled "were not major victims of the holocaust". It reminds me of when the political bandit Worker's League said,
ReplyDelete“the working class hates faggots, hippies and women’s libbers, and so do we!”
Although in the Sparts case it is much worse. They are essentially saying, "bourgeois academia, the bourgeois press and the fascists hate the disabled and so do we".
While Worker's League, now called the Socialist Equality Party has since toned down their rhetoric but even their past statement is not as grotesque as the Sparts now.
As far as disabled people being killed this article makes quite clear that the lynching of Tracy Latimer IS NOT the only time that a disabled person has been killed in such a way.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.xojane.com/issues/yet-another-disabled-child-killed-by-family
As far as disabled people being a major victim of the holocaust, the nazis were heavily inspired by eugenics (which the holocaust was largely based on). The Disabled WERE major victims of eugenics. This does not discount the fact the Jews (as well as homosexual, roma etc.) were major victims of well. Such bizarre sectoralism (pitting disabled holocaust victims againt Jewish holocaust victims) only makes sense to someone who has been thoroughly brainwashed and deprived of any thinking capacity (which is clearly the case with anyone who is a member of the ICL).
http://eugenicsarchive.org/eugenics/
http://www.dnai.org/e/index.html
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/holocaust/h-euthanasia.htm
http://www.broadreachtraining.com/advocacy/areut_derksen01.htm
As far as "affronts to the Jewish victims of the holocaust". It should be noted that for about a month the ICL was defending fascistic anti-Semitic and fascist front man Dieudonné M'bala M'bala. Jim Robertson, the "peerless leader" the ICL has also been known to waltz into restaurants when he is in Germany and order steak-a-la-auschwitz. He also been known to refer to German comrades saying "hiya comrades, hail Hitler!". And who can forget their infamous "Red Avenger" stunt where they dressed in Nazi uniforms, complete with Nazi-swastika armbands. I think this most recent screed from the ICL is an obvious example of projection. They smear me by accusing of the very thing THEY are guilty of in spades.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.icl-fi.org/print/english/wv/1039/france-censorship.html
www.bolshevik.org/1917/no4/no04nybt.html
http://www.bolshevik.org/ETB/ETB4/ETB4.htm#Underground
http://www.bolshevik.org/ETB/ETB4/ETB4.htm#Sandler
Also, a while back I remember going to a holocaust memorial in the Jewish Community Centre in Vancouver. When I said that disabled people were ALSO victims. There seemed to be no indignation on the part of the people there. In fact they seemed rather accepting and sympathetic and didn't see it as any affront. Again it is clear that this piece of pheces hearled by the ICL has no basis in reality. But of course the ICL is pretty far gone and have severed all ties with reality quite some time ago.
ReplyDelete